BNP To Allow Nonwhites To Join

In all my days, I have never thought that a party that proclaims to be "pro-white" would stoop so low to allow nonwhites to join their party. I'd rather all pro-white nationalist parties disband than allow muds and kikes to become members, just because they don't want to be called racist and white supremacist. They'll probably allow fags to join as well.

LONDON – The far-right British National Party agreed Thursday to change its constitution to let nonwhite people become members.
The party opposes immigration and says it fights for "indigenous" Britons.
A government-backed rights body took it to court, claiming the party's constitution is discriminatory.
At a court hearing, a lawyer for the party said leader Nick Griffin would ask members next month to change the constitution so it did not discriminate on the grounds of race or religion.
In an order issued at the Central London County Court, the BNP agreed to use "all reasonable endeavors" to revise its constitution to comply with the Equality Bill, which bans discrimination on the grounds of race, gender or religious belief.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission, which brought the case, said it would be watching to see whether the BNP complied.
"Political parties, like any other organization, are obliged to respect the law and not discriminate against people," said the commission's John Wadham.
There are few indications, however, that nonwhites would like to join.
The BNP has been encouraged by recent electoral success and has sought to shed a thuggish imagine and enter the political mainstream. Earlier this year it won two seats in the European Parliament.
Richard Barnbrook, the party's representative on the London Assembly, said he believed members would vote to change the constitution, because "trying to fight this court case would bankrupt the party and we have more important issues to deal with, including elections."

Benito Mussolini Paid Well As a British Agent

LONDON – A historian says Benito Mussolini was well paid as a British agent during World War I.

The Guardian newspaper reported Wednesday that Peter Martland of Cambridge University discovered that Mussolini was paid 100 pounds a week by Britain in 1917 — equal to about 6,000 pounds ($9,600) today.

The late Samuel Hoare, in charge of British agents in Rome at that time, revealed in his memoirs 55 years go that Mussolini was a paid agent. Martland found more details in Hoare's papers, including that Mussolini also sent Italian army veterans to beat up peace protesters in Milan, a dry run for his fascist blackshirt units.

"The last thing Britain wanted were pro-peace strikes bringing the factories in Milan to a halt. It was a lot of money to pay a man who was a journalist at the time, but compared to the 4 million pounds Britain was spending on the war every day, it was petty cash," The Guardian quoted Martland as saying.

The salary detail also was in historian Christopher Andrew's newly published history of the British intelligence agency MI5, to which Martland contributed.

In 1917, the future Italian dictator was editor of the Il Popolo d'Italia newspaper, which campaigned to keep Italy on the allied side in the war.

Queers Hold Rally At Washington DC

WASHINGTON – Rainbow flags fluttered above the crowds near theWhite House as tens of thousands of gay rights supporters rallied to demand that President Barack Obama keep his promises to end discrimination against gays and also let them serve openly in the military.

"Hey, Obama, let mama marry mama" some chanted Sunday. Others cried out, "We're out, we're proud, we won't back down."

Some taking part in the National Equality March woke up energized by Obama's promise to end the ban on gays serving openly in the military. He made that pledge in a speech Saturday night to theHuman Rights Campaign, nation's largest gay rights group.

The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee said Sunday that Congress will need to muster the resolve to change the "don't ask, don't tell policy" — a change that the military may be ready for.

"I think it has to be done in the right way, which is to get a buy-in from the military, which I think is now possible," said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.

Joining the march were 20 cast members from the musical, "Hair." They chose to let a Broadway matinee show go dark to come march and were led by the show's star, Gavin Creel.

"I take him at his word," the 33-year-old Creel said of Obama afterward. "This is just the beginning."

Those marching listened to activists such as Cynthia Nixon, a cast member from HBO's "Sex and the City," who hopes to marry partner Christine Marinoni next year; and Judy Shepard, whose son Matthew was killed because he was gay.

During a rally at the Capitol, keynote speaker Julian Bond — chairman of the NAACP — linked the gay rights struggle to the Civil Rights movement, saying gays and lesbians should be free from discrimination.

"Black people of all people should not oppose equality, and that is what marriage is all about," he said. "We have a lot of real and serious problems in this country, and same-sex marriage is not one of them.

For Lt. Dan Choi, the day began with a jog around Washington's memorials, calling cadence at 8 a.m. with fellow veterans and supporters before joining the march. A West Point graduate and Iraq war veteran, Choi is facing discharge under the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy for revealing in March that he is gay.

He appeared later at a rally in his Army uniform, a piece of black tape over his mouth.

"Many of us have been discharged from the service because we told the truth," he said.

Pop singer Lady Gaga, who is bisexual, got some of the biggest cheers Sunday. She didn't perform but pledged to reject homophobia in the music industry and support her "most beautiful gay fans in the world."

Unlike the first march in 1979 and others in 1987, 1993 and 2000 that included many celebrity performances and drew as many as 500,000 people, Sunday's event was driven by grassroots efforts.

Washington authorities don't disclose crowd estimates at rallies, though the crowd appeared to number in the tens of thousands, overflowing from the Capitol lawn.

Some activists doubted the march would accomplish much. They said the time and money would have been better spent working to persuade voters in Maine and Washington state, where the November ballot will include a measure that would overturn a bill granting same-sex couples many of the benefits of marriage.

A bill introducing same-sex marriage was introduced last week by the District of Columbia Council and is expected to pass.

March organizer Cleve Jones, creator of the AIDS Memorial Quilt and a protege of gay rights pioneer Harvey Milk, said he had initially discouraged a rally earlier this year. But he and others began to worry Obama was backing away from his campaign promises.

"Since we've seen that so many times before, I didn't want it to happen again," he said. "We're not settling. There's no such thing as a fraction of equality."

Israeli Foreign Minister: No Peace Plan

JERUSALEM – Israel's powerful foreign minister declared Thursday that there is no chance of reaching a final accord with the Palestinians any time soon, casting a pall over the U.S. Mideast envoy's latest effort to get peace talks moving again.
Peacemaking policy in Israel is decided by the prime minister's office, and not the foreign ministry. But Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman carries significant weight in Israeli decision-making, and his is a sentiment common among confidants of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
President Barack Obama brought Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas together in New York last month in an effort to jumpstart talks that broke down months ago. So far, no breakthroughs have been announced.
Since the New York summit, U.S. envoy George Mitchell met with representatives of Netanyahu and Abbas in the United States, and returned to the region this week. He was to meet with Lieberman and Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Thursday and has sitdowns planned with Netanyahu and Abbas for Friday.
Israeli media reported that a Mitchell aide told local journalists Wednesday that the envoy's visit was not likely to conclude with an announcement on talks resuming.
"We're going to continue with our efforts to achieve an early relaunch of negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians, because we believe that's an essential step toward achieving the comprehensive (Mideast) peace to which I earlier referred," Mitchell told reporters as he entered a meeting with Israeli President Shimon Peres on Thursday.
Lieberman told Israel Radio on Thursday that anyone who thinks the two sides can soon reach a deal ending their decades-old conflict "doesn't understand the situation and is spreading delusions."
What the two sides should do, he said, was to come up with a long-term interim arrangement that would ensure prosperity, security and stability, and leave the tough issues "to a much later stage."
This approach runs counter to U.S. efforts to reach an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal quickly. Obama has declared that establishing a Palestinian state alongside Israel is a vital U.S. interest. Also, Israel would not find a Palestinian partner for putting off a resolution to the conflict indefinitely.
Lieberman's view does not bode well for U.S. attempts to restart negotiations.
Mitchell has been laboring for months to pressure Israel to curb settlement construction. Israel has agreed to limited and temporary restrictions on building in the West Bank, but has resisted a total freeze. It has rejected any limitations on construction in east Jerusalem.
The Palestinians want the West Bank and east Jerusalem for part of their future state, along with the Gaza Strip, now ruled by Islamic Hamas militants.
Abbas has said repeatedly that he wouldn't go back to the negotiating table without a freeze. He also demands that talks begin where they broke off, with a promise from Israel that all issues will be on the table. Netanyahu has said he wouldn't be bound by the previous Israeli government's actions.
Abbas could be hard-pressed to back down now that he's dropped efforts to bring Israel before a war crimes tribunal in connection with its winter war in the Gaza Strip.
Nearly 1,400 Palestinians were killed in the war, including hundreds of civilians. Israel, which lost 13 civilians and soldiers in the war, launched the campaign to end years of Hamas rocket fire on Israeli border towns.

Somali Pirates Attack French Ship

NAIROBI (AFP) – Somali pirates attempted to storm the French navy's 18,000 tonne flagship in the Indian Ocean after mistaking it for a cargo vessel, the French military said on Wednesday.
The crew of La Somme, a 160-metre (525-foot) command vessel and fuel tanker, easily saw off the brazen night-time assault by lightly armed fighters on two lightweight skiffs and captured five pirates, a spokesman said.
"The pirates, who because of the darkness took the French ship for a commercial vessel, were on board two vessels and opened fire with Kalashnikovs," Admiral Christophe Prazuck said in Paris.
La Somme is the French command vessel in the Indian Ocean, overseeing French air, sea and land forces fighting Somali pirates and hunting terrorists under the banner of the US-led Operation Enduring Freedom.
Officers on the ship have directed commando operations to free French hostages in the hands of Somali pirates.
The pirates tried to flee when they realised their mistake but were pursued by French forces who, after an hour-long chase, caught one of the skiffs, Prazuck said.
On it they found five men but no weapons, water or food as the pirates had apparently thrown all of the boat's contents overboard, the spokesman said.
A Western official at sea in the area, speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity, said that there had been an exchange of fire between the warship and the pirate launches.
"One of the skiffs managed to get away in the night because La Somme was busy with the first pirate boat," he said.
"Despite the arrival of other vessels, they haven't yet managed to find the second boat," he said, adding that many warships in the area were busy hunting another group which attacked a cargo ship off the Seychelles on Sunday.
The world's naval powers have deployed dozens of warships to the lawless waters off Somalia over the past year to curb attacks by pirates in one of the world's busiest maritime trade routes.
La Somme was operating 250 nautical miles (460 kilometres) off the Somali coast, on its way to resupply fuel to frigates patrolling shipping lanes as part of the European Union's Operation Atalanta anti-piracy mission.
This was not the first time that Somali pirates have mistakenly attacked a French naval vessel. Several pirates were captured in May when they attempted to board a frigate in the area.
Somalia has had no proper government since it plunged into lawlessness after President Mohamed Siad Barre was overthrown in 1991.
The country is riven by factional fighting and pirate gangs operate freely from several ports along its Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden coasts.
According to the environmental watchdog Ecoterra International, at least 163 attacks have been carried out by Somali pirates since the start of 2009 alone, 47 of them successful hijackings.
Last year, more than 130 merchant ships were attacked, an increase of more than 200 percent on 2007, according to the International Maritime Bureau's Piracy Reporting Centre in Kuala Lumpur.
Pirates have in recent weeks resumed attacks with the end of the monsoon season. Last week Somali gunmen captured Spanish fishing boat The Alakrana with 36 crew members in the Indian Ocean.
The US Maritime Administration warned last month that the end of the monsoon season was likely to bring an increase in piracy off Somalia and urged shipping companies to be vigilant.
Calmer waters allow pirates, who often operate in small fibreglass skiffs towed out to sea by captured fishing vessels, to hijack freighters, trawlers and private yachts. Cruise vessels have also been attacked.

Two Decades After Pollard Case, Israel Still Has Spies in the U.S.

Two Decades After Pollard Case, Israel Still Has Spies in the U.S.

By Jeff Stein, CQ National Security Editor

The indictment last week of a top American military scientist on charges of passing secrets to Israel underscores an unhappy fact of life for U.S. counterintelligence agents: Our closest ally in the Middle East, a recipient of more than $2 billion a year in direct U.S. aid, is aggressively spying on us.
Not only that, Israeli spymasters are largely exempt from U.S. prosecution on espionage charges, say past and present counterintelligence agents, unless their activities cannot be ignored.
“It doesn’t surprise me at all,” said a senior FBI official, who talked only on the basis of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the subject. “Only when their activities become really egregious do they get prosecuted.”
Little is known about Noshir Gowadia, a U.S. citizen of Indian origin, who was already on trial in Hawaii for passing secrets about U.S. stealth technology to China.
Gowadia, 62, worked 18 years for Northrop Corp, where he was an engineer and designed the B-2 stealth bomber’s propulsion system, according to news reports. His Nov. 15 indictment by a federal grand jury in Honolulu does not detail the kinds of secrets Gowadia might have given to Israel, or how.
One of the few to be prosecuted was Jonathan Pollard, who for three years in the 1980s gave thousand s of highly classified military documents to Israeli spies working under diplomatic cover here.
But Pollard, now in the 22nd year of a 30-to-life sentence in a federal penitentiary in North Carolina, was also offering secrets to South Africa, Pakistan and others, according to a new book by the lead investigator in the case.
“Capturing Jonathan Pollard: How One of the Most Notorious Spies in American History was Brought to Justice,” by retired Navy counterintelligence agent Ron Olive, destroys the portrait of Pollard as an Israeli Nathan Hale.
Some documents ended up in the hands of Soviet leaders, intelligence sources maintain.
More recently, Pentagon intelligence analyst Larry Franklin pled guilty to passing secrets to two officials of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, the face of the so-called Israeli lobby here.
But those are anomalies, according to veteran FBI and CIA operatives.
Despite the highly publicized Pollard case, Israeli agents never stopped trying to recruit “moles” in the U.S. government, multiple and reliable intelligence sources say.
That’s in addition to stealing American industrial, technical and scientific secrets here.
Over the Line
A spokesman for Israel’s embassy in Washington dismisses such allegations.
“The U.S. and Israel share the closest relations on national security issues,” the spokesman, David Siegel, said by telephone. “Any assertions to the contrary are ridiculous.”
Siegel “categorically” denied that Israel has spies in the U.S. government.
Former and present U.S. intelligence officials tell a different story.
John M. Cole, an FBI spy catcher who retired in 2004, says that from 1993 to 1995 alone, he had “125 open cases” of Israeli espionage, representing nearly half of all the investigations carried on in his Global Unit, part of the now-defunct National Security division. (The pre-9/11 Global Unit was responsible for all espionage threats except Russia and China.)
The 125 figure “makes sense,” another former top FBI counterintelligence official said, speaking only on condition that he not be identified because of the issue’s sensitivity.
This official called the Israeli embassy’s denials “horse [manure].”
In fact, he said, U.S. officials repeatedly warned the Israelis to back off. But the finger-wagging only seemed to energize them.
“We would call them in, call them on the carpet, and next week there would be 10 more cases,” he said.
The Justice Department never seemed much interested in prosecuting them, he and other counterintelligence veterans said.
“Agents would get pissed off,” said the former top official. “We knew they were going to walk, that they were going to get a pass. . . . It was frustrating.”
Inside the FBI itself, Cole said, tracking suspected Israeli spies was hush-hush.
In a sharp break with FBI procedures, he was prohibited from notifying field offices when an investigation crept into their jurisdictions.
“No one was supposed to know we were investigating the Israelis,” Cole said.
For FBI agents new to counterintelligence, the aggressive Israeli espionage operations came as a surprise.
“They were trying to get inside [the U.S government], to understand our real intentions and intelligence” on them and their adversaries from Moscow to Riyadh, the former counterintelligence official added.
“Many of us didn’t understand at first that they weren’t our friends, they were Israelis,” the senior former official said. There was “a bit of a mind set in the FBI” that since the Israelis were allies — and much admired ones at that — their espionage “hijinks” didn’t merit much concern.
One of the more notorious hijinks surfaced in 2000, when Israeli agents were discovered eavesdropping on the White House and other sensitive telephone systems, according to media leaks at the time.
“The FBI had identified no one to arrest during its investigation,” the Associated Press quoted senior FBI officials as saying.
Last week, a knowledgeable FBI source told me it was yet another case of “looking the other way.”
But Dave Szady, who recently retired as head of FBI counterintelligence programs, says, “It depends on the circumstances.”
“In the counterintelligence world, neutralization is sometimes as effective as prosecuting them,” he said.
“The Israelis are our great friends,” he added, “but sometimes they step over the line.”‘PNG-ed’
Cole said he had developed a case involving a civilian employee at a military base who was giving secrets to an Israeli military liaison officer.
“Other people within the government were involved also,” he said, declining to offer more details. He said he referred the cases to the Justice Department, “but nobody wanted to pursue it.”
Over the years, he said, a few Israeli spies were quietly “PNG-ed,” declared persona non grata and sent home.
But for the most part, “It was kept pretty quiet, because of the politics involved.”
Officials at the White House National Security Council and the Justice Department did not return calls asking about Israeli espionage in the United States.
Some FBI officials made a stab at getting White House backing for prosecutions, but “no one was going to fall on their sword” over it, the former top counterintelligence official said. There were too many more important things going on, particularly in the Middle East, where Washington, short on assets and language skills, needed Israel’s help.
They ‘Go Too Far’
For 13 years, a succession of Israeli prime ministers and defense officials insisted to U.S. presidents that Pollard was part of a “rogue operation” not sanctioned by Tel Aviv.
Finally, on May 11, 1998, under growing pressure from Israeli politicians and public opinion, they admitted he was theirs all along, awarded him Israeli citizenship, and began petitioning for his release.
The latest was Ehud Olmert, who brought up Pollard during his low-key summit meeting with President Bush last week, Israeli sources said.
Since several Bush administration national security officials have close ties to Israel, some intelligence sources speculated that the White House might give in to Olmert’s importuning.
But Bush would likely face an uproar from U.S. intelligence officials if he did, if President Clinton’s experience in 1998 is any guide.
When word leaked that Clinton might release Pollard during a summit with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, then-CIA Director George Tenet threatened to resign.
The Israelis “go too far,” says Cole. “They have crossed the line by tasking and paying people to steal our secrets.”
Source: New England Media Watch

David Duke Found Not Guilty In Czech Republic

Dr. David Duke Proved Innocent in Czech Republic!

On Tuesday, September 29, at his home in Mandeville, Louisiana, Dr. David Duke learned that speech charges brought against him in the Czech Republic that could have resulted in three years imprisonment have been dismissed.

According to Novinky News Service in the Czech Republic, the State Prosecutor has stated that
the charges against David Duke are dismissed because there is absolutely no evidence that David Duke broke any laws on Holocaust denial or for allegedly supporting “anti-Democratic” movements. The acknowledgment shows that Duke’s arrest and jailing was based on no substance, and was simply a means of silencing him and keeping the Czech people from hearing him.

Speaking from his home in Mandeville Louisiana, David Duke issued this statement:
As an American who has long admired the Czech people and their courageous fight against Bolshevik occupation, murder and repression, I was shocked to be arrested, Soviet style, in an effort to keep the Czech people from hearing my political opinions. My exoneration shows that there are still men in the Czech government who are worthy of their Czech history of fighting for freedom.

I am thankful to the Czech people and the Czech government under the Honorable President, Václav Klaus, for the admission that I had I not broken any laws on so-called Holocaust denial. Far from supporting movements opposed to human rights, I am a staunch advocate of human rights; not the least of these are the human rights of free speech and free expression.
Although I take no specific position on the tragedy called the Holocaust, and although I did not come to the Czech Republic to lecture on this issue, I do believe that it is a human rights outrage that academics in some places in Europe have been imprisoned and prosecuted for simply researching and questioning some aspects of the Holocaust or other historical aspects of the Second World War. Millions more Europeans were murdered by Bolshevism. So why is 99 percent of media attention on Jewish losses in the Second World War while we hear almost nothing about the tens of millions of Christian victims? Thousands of movies, plays, documentaries are shown about the Holocaust, but zero about the Holodomor (the Ukrainian genocide) for instance. Am I wrong to think that the media and political agents of Zionist Israel need Holocaust mania to keep attention off Israel’s terror, expulsion, torture, murder, and theft against the Palestinians? Today, a multi-media Holocaust is used as a weapon of mass destruction against the Palestinians, the Iraqis, the Syrians and the Iranians, anyone who is an
enemy of the Zionist, Jewish supremacist State of Israel.

How can European leaders condemn the jailing of dissidents in China or Tibet or Iran and yet continue to seek the imprisonment of even elderly men and women for simply researching or expressing opinions about long past historical events? Those European criminals who imprison people for their opinions are the ones who should be prosecuted for “human rights violations.” Think about it. Express an opinion about an historical event: go to jail! But, put people in prison for simply expressing a political or historical opinion: no outrage, no protest, no problem!
It is a scandal that researchers and historians such as David Irving have been imprisoned for their opinions. I urge the Czech government to completely reject political repression reminiscent of the Soviet occupation and free non-violent political activists who have been recently jailed for politically incorrect opinions. Even musicians and artists are facing imprisonment in the Czech Republic and elsewhere in Europe for expressing “the wrong” opinions, even the wrong lyrics in their songs. Men and women who have tried to defend the Czech people from encroaching loss of freedom from the EU bureaucrats and who warn of the great dangers ahead from massive non-European immigration have been imprisoned in repression worthy of Soviet occupation, not a free Czech Republic.

I also want to state that I commend the courageous stand of Václav Klaus against the EU totalitarian, Treaty of Lisbon. His defense of the rights of the Czech people are commendable and I urge him to defend the human rights of all political dissidents in the Czech Republic. President Klaus, I urge you to set these Czech dissidents free!

Finally, I must once more state that I am very aware why I was prosecuted in the Czech Republic. My arrest was not the will of the Czech people, for real Czechs believe in freedom of speech. It was powerful Zionists who threatened and caused the cancellation of my lecture at Charles University, and it was they who behind the scenes and in the press agitated for my arrest.

They did so for one reason. They don’t want anyone especially a formerly elected American political personage to expose the Jewish extremists in media, politics and international finance as exampled by Goldman Sachs, that have led America and Europe to economic disaster at home and that lead the world to war and conflict in the Mideast. Now they seek a new, insane war against Iran, a war that will have catastrophic and horrific consequences for Europe, America, Iran and the world. The powerful Jewish extremists in politics and in media could simply not afford an American to speak out frankly on these issues in the Czech Republic. And that is what was behind my arrest and silencing in Prague.

To my many friends in the Czech Republic, I urge you to act honorably, legally, non-violently and with a spirit of Christian kindness and fairness. I urge to take the political road, as patriotic movements are growing all over Europe, America and the world. You will find eventual victory.
To the Czech government, I beseech you to not repress political activism and freedom and thus actually drive people, in a feeling of helplessness, to violence and intemperance.
In the spirit of Jan Hus I urge President Václav and the Czech people to defend your wonderful tradition of fighting for freedom. To do so in a spirit of love and honor.

God Bless the people of the Czech Republic!

Former member of the House of Representatives, Louisiana

United States of America

Spoken from my home in Mandeville, Louisiana on September 29, 2009
Representative Duke, who has a PhD in history, and is well known in Europe as a powerful critic of Zionism, traveled to the Czech Republic in April of 2009 at the invitation of professors at Charles University where he was to lecture on the “Zionist Influence over American Foreign Policy.” Charles University is one of the oldest universities in all of Europe and famous for its commitment to the right of free speech and conscience. Extreme pressure from Jewish extremist partisans of Israel caused the cancellation of Duke’s lecture and instigated his arrest for supposedly violating laws prohibiting free speech on the Holocaust, Second World War issues, and strongly critical speech against Israel. (you can find the text and recording of the lecture at www.davidduke.com)

Ironically, Dr. Duke was arrested under a vague statute that prohibited the promotion of movements that threaten human rights. Aware of these draconian laws, David Duke does not specifically contest any parts of the mainstream media Holocaust dogma, but he argues that leading revisionist academics such as Robert Faurisson, Jurgen Graf and others are courageous men who risk their freedom and well-being in defense of their conscience and intellectual inquiry. Far from supporting the violation of human rights, David Duke is actually a human rights activist who says that putting people in jail for their research and their opinions is against the most fundamental of human rights. He says that those truly guilty of human rights violations are government officials who seek to imprison people for their human rights of free speech and for politically incorrect opinions.

Dr. Duke was arrested with Czech patriots at a restaurant shortly after being given a special tour of the famous St. Vitus Cathedral overlooking Prague. Dr. Duke was arrested for violating speech laws before he had even given any public speech or lecture. At the time of his arrest a Czech swat team of 30 swooped in and interrupted an interview with Czech newspaper reporter. The interview was recorded and is available for listening at www.davidduke.com.
In the interview, David Duke condemns violence as both immoral and counterproductive for our people, he defends the human rights of free speech, political association and expression. He shows that Europeans and Americans face an existential crisis with mass immigration. And, he shows the undue, influence of pro-Israel Jewish extremists over European and the American politics and policy and the danger they represent for war and repression around the world. He also ardently makes the case against the criminal, terrorist State of Israel and the influential Zionists who are leading the world to war, conflict, terrorism and hatred. Listen to the interview at this link on www.davidduke.com

Ironically, as Dr. Duke reiterated the fundamental human rights of all people, 30 Swat team police swooped down, handcuffed him and took him away to jail. It seemed that all he said to the Prague reporter came true: that human rights are being lost in the European Union.
By John Swifter (Post&Opinion)