Friday, April 24, 2009

Aiken TEA Party

Tomorrow on Saturday, April 25, from 1-5 p.m., theres going to be a TEA party at the Alley in Downtown Aiken (behind the Aiken Munincipal) Please bring your own home-made sign and a folding chair and send a message to Washington to stop government bailouts and pork barreling. Come listen to several speakers and there will be live music and entertainment. Masses arise!

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

GM to close most of it's factories

DETROIT – Two people briefed on the plan say General Motors Corp. will close most of its U.S. factories for up to nine weeks this summer because of slumping sales and growing inventories of unsold vehicles.
The people did not know exactly when the shutdowns would occur, but both say they will include the normal two-week closure in July to change from one model year to the next. Neither person wanted to be identified because workers have not been told of the shutdowns.
GM spokesman Chris Lee would not comment other than to say the company notifies employees before making any production cuts public.
GM is living on $13.4 billion in government loans and faces a June 1 deadline to restructure or seek bankruptcy protection.

Monday, April 20, 2009

4/20

Happy Birthday to the Fuhrer. You're spirit lives on forever. 14/88

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

The Tube Be Damned

by Joe Rebel

Yesterday morning, I was flipping through the channels when I happened to catch the Steve Wilko's Show. To those who don't know Steve Wilko's is, he used to be the head security guy for Jerry (Jewry) Springer and now has his own show. First of all, I hate most, if not all talk-shows. I find them boring and the hosts have no talent whatsoever. They just try to find the most trashiest people and place them on for pure shock value.

Some way of making a living, especially in these troubled times.

Anyways, the topic was called "I would kill for the Klan" and it had on a fifteen year old girl who said she hated black, but never gave a real good reason why except that she thought they were "nasty" (which they are mostly) and said that she wanted to join the Klan because she wanted to kill black people. She said she was racist and yet she loved her two half-black nieces.

Of course the host and her mother and boyfriend berated her for her "wicked" way of thinking and all that nonsense. All about how racist are evil and those who have racist views must be exposed and reducated. At the end, after being entirely bashed, she decided that she didn't want to be racist anymore.

Like I said, it's pure shock value.

My first thought was that this girl was a complete idiot for not having one ounce of sense about what white nationalism is. But then it disturbed me even more that a lot of what most white's, especially white youth get their ideas about what white nationalism is from the media. They may be racist, but they're are buying into what the Jews and liberals say about us, which some of the things they accuse us of is plain out fallacious.

To say the least, a lot of folks, including racially conscious whites have some very f***ed-up views about white nationalism/national socialism is all about. They see something about us on the Jew tube and how the media says this about us and what we believe without even bothering to check out our websites and blogs about what we really believe and fight for.

I don't expect our enemies to do this of course, being that they prefer to stick to the lies and misnomers about white nationalists. Whenever we expose them for the liars they really are, they taunt us and call us names like the immature school children they really are.

Whiny little bastards they are.

Those who join the white power movement only because of what they heard from the media, you are in a big shock. If you want to join all because you saw a movie where Nazi's gassed Jews and turned them into soap or you saw a documentary about how the Klan lynched Negroes and firebombed synagougues, I am sad to inform you that you have been lied too. Although the thought of doing such things don't sound bad, you are clearly missing the point.

The first lesson is love your race and look out for kith and kin. We are here to perserve our race and to keep it from being eradicated from the face of the earth by other racial groups. We do not wish to rule over the other races, we merely wish to be seperated from them and have our own territories.

Those who base racism on skin color alone and nothing else don't have very much of an argument to begin with. Though skin color plays a big part, it is not the whole of the argument. There are other factors to consider as well, such as the physical (not just skin color), mental, biological, cultural, and spiritual differences between whites and nonwhites.

Yes, I know, a lot of people have problems with us. Do we really care? Not really! If you believe in abortion, gay rights, race-mixing, drugs, communism, and globalism, then you won't like us, because we're not for any of that stuff. When we fet power, all that is going to go.

To all new racialists, if you are not happy with what I have just said about what white nationalism really is, then there's the door. We can not afford troublemakers in our groups. They give us all a bad name.

However, if you are still interested, I welcome you as a comrade-at-arms.

American Crew Who Thwarted Somali Pirates Heads Home

MOMBASA, Kenya – The American crew who thwarted Somali pirates was flying home to the U.S. on Wednesday but without its captain, who was still aboard a Navy destroyer after being rescued from the hijackers, their shipping company said.
Maersk spokesman Gordan van Hook said the crew members of the Maersk Alabama left Mombasa on a chartered plane heading for Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland, where they were expected to land late Wednesday.
Their reunion with Capt. Richard Phillips will now will take place in the United States, van Hook said. Phillips had planned to fly home with his crew but he was aboard the USS Bainbridge when it was diverted Tuesday to try to help a second U.S. cargo ship under attack by pirates. That ship, the Liberty Sun, escaped the attack.
A Kenyan airport official said a second chartered plane was waiting at the Mombasa airport for Phillips.
Navy SEAL snipers on the Bainbridge killed three pirates Sunday to free Phillips after a five-day standoff.
Phillips' wife, Andrea, and two children are expected to reunite with him but her mother, Catherine Coggio, said she didn't know when or where. Andrea Phillips was still in Vermont as of Wednesday morning, she said.
"We're just so thankful that things have turned out the way they have," Coggio told The Associated Press by phone from her home in Richmond, Vt.
She didn't know when Phillips would return to Underhill, Vt., where he lives.
A woman who answered the phone at Phillips' home would give no details of the family's plans.
Serena Murphy, the wife of chief officer Shane Murphy, joked that she will take him hostage when he gets home to Seekonk, Mass.
"Well, I'm going to give him food and water. That's a positive for him. But I think I'll make the accommodations a lot more pleasant than the pirates did," she said Wednesday on NBC's "Today" show.
Asked if she wants him to go back to sea, she said, "I personally don't but I support him in whatever decision he decides to make."
Third mate Colin Wright said the experience won't keep him off the water, but hopes action will be taken to stop piracy.
"I hope to be able to sail all of the waters of the world in safety," he said in an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America." "And we've got to do something about pirates."
Wright, from Galveston, Texas, and Murphy told ABC the first thing they want to do is hug their families.
"I'll just love to hug my mother," Wright said. "Everybody out there give your mother a hug. Yeah, don't wait. Life is precious. And what a beautiful world."
The sister of second mate Ken Quinn was praying for him to get safely back home. She told CBS' "Early Show" that Ken, who lives in Bradenton, Fla., had e-mailed her that "he's having nightmares about being in the dark room where they were hiding, and the pirates shooting into the dark."

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

US, Russia Want To Reduce Nukes

LONDON – The United States and Russia committed Wednesday to resetting strained relations, as presidents Barrack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev issued sweeping statements on global cooperation, including a headline-grabbing agreement to quickly negotiate a new treaty to limit nuclear weapons.
As they sat down for their first face-to-face meeting, Obama and Medvedev declared in their joint statements that the "era when our countries viewed each other as enemies is long over."
While agreeing to work overtime to negotiate a replacement for the seminal 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START, which expires at year's end, the two leaders vowed at the same time to jointly confront other perceived threats. They specifically mentioned the nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea and al-Qaida militants who have found refuge in Pakistan.
The statements could serve as a major boost for both Obama and Medvedev, who are new to the foreign policy proving grounds and are in need of the other's help.
If Medvedev is successful, with Obama, in midwifing the birth of a new nuclear reduction treaty, he will solidify his hold on Kremlin power, where former President Vladimir Putin is perpetually looking over the shoulder of his hand-picked successor.
Obama stands to gain a major ally in the foreign policy problems most vexing to his administration, particularly Iran, Afghanistan and North Korea.
Konstantin Kosachyov, the Kremlin-connected head of the parliament's foreign affairs committee, said the main outcome of the meeting was that it "broke the inertia of thinking that has accumulated on both sides."
"The meeting was needed to break that vicious circle, and it was absolutely successful," Kosachyov said, according to the RIA Novosti news agency.
Both men directed their negotiating teams to finish the task of setting broad outlines for a treaty to replace START by the end of July. That conceivably would leave time to get the new treaty approved in the U.S. Senate by the December expiration of the current agreement. But arms control experts say December is not a hard deadline so long as there is progress.
"The parties have gone from words to action," said Sergei Rogov, the head of USA and Canada Institute.
RIA Novosti reported that Rogov believed quickly reopening arms control talks "offers a real prospect that a new treaty will be signed before the year's end."
Rogov said that arms control talks will help create "favorable conditions for reaching agreements on a host of other issues, including the Iranian nuclear problem and cooperation in fighting the Taliban and al-Qaida."
Currently, the United States has 2,200 strategic nuclear warheads deployed; Russia has 2,800. Under the subsequent 2002 Treaty of Moscow, a plan negotiated under the Bush administration, the two sides committed to reducing their nuclear warheads to between 1,700 and 2,200.
But that treaty did not establish its own system for verifying compliance; instead it said verification would rest upon the existing provisions of the START treaty. But if START expires in December without a replacement in place, the Moscow Treaty would be left with no legally binding system for verification.
Obama has declared his belief that the United States and Russia should take the lead in ridding the world of nuclear weapons altogether. Russian and American arms control experts believe that the START replacement treaty would seek initially to cut strategic warhead arsenals to 1,500 on each side.
After their first meeting, the White House also announced that Obama was accepting Medvedev's invitation to visit Moscow this summer.
"Over the last several years, the relationship between our two countries has been allowed to drift," Obama told reporters after his meeting with Medvedev. "What I believe we've begun today is a very constructive dialogue that will allow us to work on issues of mutual interest."
Striking a similar tone with the U.S. president at his side, the Russian president said: "I am more optimistic of the successful development of our relations."
They did not immediately address the major issue of American preparations to deploy a missile shield in Poland and Czechoslovakia, but in their joint statement the United States acknowledged Russian concerns. Obama has said deployment of the anti-missile system still depends on its being proved an effective weapon.
Privately, his administration is believed ready to delay deployment for the sake of improving ties with the Kremlin.
Their newly-professed commitment to reinvigorate arms-control initiatives that have lain dormant for years caused a stir at the London site of a G-20 summit that seemed otherwise transfixed on a deepening worldwide recession.
Obama trumpeted the new arms undertaking as representing "great progress" between Moscow and Washington on areas where the two have mutual interests, although he also said he wouldn't try to minimize differences.
"What we're seeing today is the beginning of new progress in U.S.-Russian relations," he said.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs noted that the two countries have not settled on a new cap for nuclear arms.
The session between the two presidents was not just a get-to-know-you meeting, said senior Obama administration officials who spoke on condition of anonymity to more freely describe the private discussions. Both sides worked for weeks ahead of time to develop two joint statements.
Obama and his aides were particularly pleased at what they saw as small progress on Russia's position on Iran, with Moscow coming closer to agreeing that Tehran could be pursuing nuclear weapons and thus pose a threat, and on agreement about the threat from extremists in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
But the talks were not all about agreement. Last August's devastating war between Russia and the former Soviet republic of Georgia came up, with Obama saying directly that Georgia's pro-Moscow separatist regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia would never be recognized as independent by the United States, the officials said.
Obama and Medvedev made it clear that progress on a new arms-reduction deal must be made by the time of the U.S. president's planned visit to Moscow in July, the officials said. Both sides recognize that negotiating a new treaty will be difficult, with many thorny issues to resolve.